Vladimir Putin recently made comments on the seriousness of global conflicts that can lead to nuclear conflict. Patriots worldwide should pay close attention as the globalists build their dangerous nuclear arsenal.
In stark contrast to attempts in numerous western countries to stifle free speech online, Russian President Vladimir Putin defended Internet freedom during a conference...
A prominent Swedish lawmaker asserts that Hungarian billionaire George Soros's influence on European politics and policies make him "one of the most dangerous men,"
Syrian president
Bashar Al-Assad has sent a letter to Russian president Vladimir Putin,
expressing his condolences over the recent Russian Il-20 plane crash in
Syria, local media reported.
Syrian
president Bashar Al-Assad wrote in his letter to Vladimir Putin that
the Russian Il-20 plane crash near Hmeymim air base was a result
of Israeli arrogance, SANA news agency reported.
Syrian
president expressed his condolences over the tragedy and said that he
hoped that the plane crash would not impede Russian and Syrian joint
fight against terrorism.
The Russian Hmeymim airbase in Syria had lost contact with the Il-20
military aircraft late on Monday during the attack of Israeli F-16
aircraft on Syrian targets in the province of Latakia. The Russian
Defense Ministry said later that the Israeli military deliberately
created a dangerous situation by using the Russian aircraft as a shield
against Syrian air defense systems.
Earlier, Israeli military delegation led by Air Force Commander Maj.
Gen. Amikam Norkin will travel to Moscow on September 20
with information about the crash of the aircraft.
After the tragic downing of a Russian military plane on Monday night off
the Syrian coast, the blame game is intensifying between the main
parties, directly or indirectly involved in the incident.
An organization called the “Data & Society” group is now lobbying YouTube to censor conservative voices. Paul Joseph Watson explains how George Soros is funding this attack on free speech.
Project Veritas has released the second installment in an undercover video series unmasking the deep state. This video features a Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government owned software and computers to push a socialist agenda. Also featured is Jessica Schubel, the former Chief of Staff for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services during the last Obama administration. Both Schubel and Hrabar make admissions revealing that federal employees are using their positions in the government to resist or slow the Trump administration's policies, some breaking laws in the process.
FBI, DOJ Plan Redactions Despite Trump’s Document Order
(Bloomberg)
-- President Donald Trump has demanded the “immediate declassification”
of sensitive materials about the Russia investigation, but the agencies
responsible are expected to propose redactions that would keep some
information secret, according to three people familiar with the matter.
The
Justice Department, FBI and Office of the Director of National
Intelligence are going through a methodical review and can’t offer a
timeline for finishing, said the people, who weren’t authorized to speak
publicly about the sensitive matter.
The
White House issued a statement on Monday listing material that Trump
wants declassified immediately, echoing demands of Republican lawmakers
who share his contention that the continuing investigation into Russian
interference in the 2016 election was tainted by anti-Trump bias well
before Robert Mueller was named special counsel to run it.
Among
Trump’s demands was the full public release of all text messages
concerning the Russia probe by Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and
by several former officials, including two who were fired -- former FBI
Director James Comey and his deputy, Andrew McCabe. One person
described the order to release text messages as unprecedented, and
another said additional talks will probably be held with the White House
over the matter.
The
Justice Department and FBI are expected to submit their documents and
proposed redactions to the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, which will assemble all the material into a package and
hand it over to the White House, according to the people.
While
the agencies want to guard against revealing classified sources and
methods about the ongoing Russia investigation, doing so could put them
in direct conflict with Trump, who as president has the power to
override the agencies and declassify material on his own.
It’s
too early to say if any officials would resign in protest should Trump
do that, one person said. Trump could ask the agencies to go back and
scrub the redacted material further.
Critics,
including leading congressional Democrats, contend that Trump has
crossed a line by ordering release of the documents in order to
interfere with and undermine the Russia investigation in which he’s a
key figure.
“President
Trump, in a clear abuse of power, has decided to intervene in a pending
law enforcement investigation by ordering the selective release of
materials he believes are helpful to his defense team and thinks will
advance a false narrative,” Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat
on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Monday.
Triggering Review
Trump took the rare step of ordering material released after a group of conservative House Republicans asked him to do so.
“When
the president issues such an order, it triggers a declassification
review process that is conducted by various agencies within the
intelligence community, in conjunction with the White House counsel, to
seek to ensure the safety of America’s national security interests,” a
Justice Department spokesman said in a statement. “The department and
the Federal Bureau of Investigation are already working with the
Director of National Intelligence to comply with the president’s order.”
Some
of what Trump requested was well known to the Justice Department and
FBI and was already under review for potential declassification.
They
have already been reviewing whether and how to release more of a
previously secret warrant application to eavesdrop on Carter Page, a
foreign policy adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign who was flagged
by intelligence agencies as a target of Russian interest. Page hasn’t
been accused of wrongdoing and has said that while he had conversations
with Russian officials, he wasn’t an agent of the Russian government.
The
agencies also have been reviewing whether and how to release reports of
interviews with Ohr on his role in the Russia inquiry.
But
another part of the White House statement caused confusion because it
asked for “all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all
Carter Page FISA applications.
Confidential Informant
The
Justice Department is interpreting that request to mean information
about the use of a confidential informant during the early parts of the
investigation, one person said. The department had previously briefed
the “Gang of Eight,” Republican and Democratic congressional leaders and
heads of the Intelligence committees, on the informant.
Trump
and his supporters have repeatedly attacked the FBI and Justice
Department for relying partly on a dossier on Trump compiled by former
British spy Christopher Steele in order to get the warrant on Page. They
contend that Justice and FBI officials didn’t fully disclose that
Steele was paid in part by Trump’s rival in the presidential
campaign, Hillary Clinton.
Democrats have said information other than the Steele dossier was used to obtain the warrant on Page.
The
initial warrant request called Page “an agent of a foreign power” and
said “the FBI believes Page has been the subject of targeted recruitment
by the Russian government,” according to the document.
US President Donald Trump has once again criticized Jeff
Sessions, telling The Hill in an exclusive interview that he “doesn’t
have an attorney-general” and that he’s “very disappointed” with
Sessions.
I don’t have an attorney-general. It’s very sad
Trump told Hill.TV in an exclusive interview in the Oval Office on Tuesday.
He went on to say that he “didn’t see” what was coming when he nominated Sessions for the role.
“I’m
so sad over Jeff Sessions because he came to me. He was the first
senator that endorsed me. And he wanted to be attorney-general, and I
didn’t see it,” he said.
In true Trump fashion, he then went on to state that Sessions performed "very poorly" in the nominating process.
...I
mean, he was mixed up and confused, and people that worked with him
for, you know, a long time in the Senate were not nice to him, but he
was giving very confusing answers. Answers that should have been easily
answered. And that was a rough time for him.
Trump
has long expressed his frustration with Sessions for recusing himself
from the Russia investigation in March, after it emerged that he had
held two meetings with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the
presidential race and had not disclosed them to the Senate during his
confirmation hearing.
“He gets in and probably because of the
experience that he had going through the nominating when somebody asked
him the first question about Hillary Clinton or something he said ‘I
recuse myself, I recuse myself,’" Trump said.
“And now it turned out he didn’t have to recuse himself,"
Trump said, referring to the fact that the FBI wrote in a 2017 email to
a Sessions aid that Sessions did not need to reveal contacts with
foreign government officials that were made in the course of his work as
a senator. That email was made public in December.
As speculation
continues to swirl on whether Trump will fire Sessions, the president
declined to provide a straightforward answer.
“We’ll see what
happens. A lot of people have asked me to do that. And I guess I study
history, and I say I just want to leave things alone, but it was very
unfair what he did,” he said, referring to his decision to recuse himself from the Russia probe.
We’ll see how it goes with Jeff. I’m very disappointed in Jeff. Very disappointed
The
Tuesday comments aren't the first time that Trump has publicly slammed
Sessions. Earlier this month, he took to Twitter to accuse Sessions of
damaging the chances of Republicans in the November mid-term elections
through Justice Department investigations.
Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......
In August, Trump told Fox News that Sessions has allowed Democrats to control the Justice Department and get away with "subversion" of his administration.
“I put in an attorney general that never took control of the Justice Department, Jeff Sessions,” he told the "Fox and Friends" morning program. “It’s sort of an incredible thing.”
Sessions fired back, saying in a statement: “I took control of the Department of Justice the day I was sworn in."
In May, the US president admitted that he regrets appointing Sessions as attorney-general.
Rep.Trey Gowdy, “I don’t think so, I think what the President is doing is expressing frustration that Attorney General Sessions should have shared these reasons for recusal before he took the job, not afterward. If I were the President and I picked someone to be the country’s....
....chief law enforcement officer, and they told me later, ‘oh by the way I’m not going to be able to participate in the most important case in the office, I would be frustrated too...and that’s how I read that - Senator Sessions, why didn’t you tell me before I picked you.....
A region in western Ukraine has decided to ban public displays
of pretty much anything in Russian, claiming the move is necessary to
preserve unity in the country. The authors want the ban to go
nationwide.
The Lvov region's legislature voted on Tuesday to impose a moratorium on the "public use of Russian-language cultural products in all forms," with 58 votes in favor, exceeding the 43 necessary.
The "moratorium" is to remain in place until there is "a full de-occupation of Ukrainian territory," practically making it a permanent ban.
In addition to banning Russian songs, films, books and…
whatever else, the lawmakers said they would recommend a similar ban to
the national parliament. They said rooting out the Russian language was
necessary "to protect the Ukrainian information space from hybrid
action by the aggressor-state [Russia] and reverse the consequences of
many years of Russification."
The ban is the latest in a long
string of attacks on the Russian language in Ukraine, where it
continues to be the largest minority language, used by millions in daily
life, despite years of antagonism with Moscow.
Last year, the
government imposed harsh quotas on broadcasters, requiring no less than
75 percent of their content to be in Ukrainian. Dozens of Russian books,
films, and TV series have been banned for things like showing Russian
law enforcement officers in a positive way (therefore, there are no more
Russian crime dramas in Ukraine).
People using Russian may also face harassment in Ukraine. Speaking Russian in the Ukrainian parliament is usually met with angry shouts from "patriotic" MPs and discouragement
from whoever is presiding at the session. One representative last year
was simply barred from ending his speech, even though he was not fluent
enough in Ukrainian to meet to the demands.
There
is also a lot of pressure to abandon the Russian language on the public
level. More outspoken figures like writer Larisa Nitsoy or former MP
Irina Farion regularly share their latest outrage over how schools teach children too much math and physics and too little Ukrainian literature, or say
that speakers of Russian should not have access to education or jobs in
Ukraine. But there are those with less extreme rhetoric working to make
Russian undesirable.
The language issue has been
divisive for Ukrainian society for decades. When the Bolshevik
government attempted to undermine Ukrainian nationalism and separatism
in the wake of the revolution, it added a large portion of historically
Russian land. The integration was not all smooth, especially since
people living in what is now eastern Ukraine were forced
to learn Ukrainian, read the Ukrainian-language press, and otherwise
change their ways. The result of that period of Ukrainization was far
from conclusive.
After splitting from the Soviet Union and
becoming an independent state, Ukraine faced similar problems as its
government tried to establish a new national identity for its people.
Over the years, Ukrainian gradually gained ground, but the
change was too slow for the nationalist segment of the nation. And of
course, neighboring Russia was a major influence on culture in Ukraine,
keeping Russian alive.
The 2014 armed coup in Kiev and subsequent
conflict with Russia brought the nationalist agenda to the forefront in
Ukraine. In fact, one of the first acts of the new leadership was to
scrap a language law which guaranteed a special regional status for
Russian. This was a major factor in the pushback that arose in the east
of the country, which led to a rebellion and the current frozen
conflict.
The pursuit of language superiority brought Ukraine into
conflict with other neighbors last year when it passed a new education
law, under which the right of Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian, and
Russian minorities to have their children taught in their preferred
language was seriously undermined.
The countries involved were
outraged, with Hungary going as far as pledging to undermine any attempt
by Ukraine to have closer ties with NATO. So far, Bucharest has been
delivering on its threat.