Showing posts with label Christopher Steele. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Steele. Show all posts
Author of the fake Trump-Russia dossier admits it was created so Clinton could challenge 2016 election results
Russia TruthDecember 18, 2018Christopher Steele, Clinton, deep state, FBI, James Comey, Robert Mueller, RT, Russia, Russia collusion, Steele Dossier, Trump
No comments
[RT] The British ex-spy who authored the infamous dossier alleging collusion between Donald Trump and the Kremlin said one of his goals was to give Hillary Clinton legal basis to challenge the 2016 election results.
Christopher Steele’s salacious 17-page report was commissioned by Fusion GPS, a firm connected to Clinton’s campaign.
“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election,” Steele wrote in recently unsealed declaration that was published by the Washington Times.
His statement is part of a series of answers which Steele provided in a defamation suit brought by three Russians who head Alfa Bank, who were named in the dossier as part of the alleged collusion conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin.
The court challenge never came. Instead, the unsubstantiated dossier was leaked to news outlets such as BuzzFeed, fuelling Russiagate hysteria and serving as the backbone of a two-year probe that has yet to corroborate any of the document’s core claims. The document was also used by the FBI to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page, who was accused by Steele of meeting secretly with Kremlin insiders in Moscow. Incredibly, former FBI Director James Comey admitted that his agency had not verified the dossier’s contents before using it to justify the warrant.
The dossier itself has apparently fallen out of favor with many of its early champions: One of the first journalists to report on Steele’s research has stated that many of Steele’s central claims have yet to be substantiated and are “likely false.”
The defamation case against Steele was dismissed by a DC Superior Court judge, but lawyers representing the Russian bankers have launched an appeal in US District court, attaching Steele’s revelatory statements as part of their filing. Steele claimed that internet traffic data had been observed between Alfa Bank and a computer served linked to the Trump Organization.
The allegation has yet to be proven, with some reports suggesting that the flagged data actually originated from an internet spam farm based outside Philadelphia.
Steele faces similar legal trouble in London, where he is being sued for defamation by Russian entrepreneur Aleksej Gubarev. In one of his memos, Steele accused Gubarev of personally hacking DNC computers. Gubarev has also sued BuzzFeed for publishing the unverified claim as part of its uncritical coverage of the dossier.
Steele dossier’s main claims ‘likely false,’ admits journalist who helped launch Russiagate
Russia TruthDecember 18, 2018Christopher Steele, FBI, Robert Mueller, RT, Russiagate, Steele Dossier, Trump
No comments
[RT] The explosive dossier that fueled Russiagate and served as justification for snooping on a top Trump aide contains numerous claims that are “likely false,” according to one of the first journalists to report on the document.
© AFP / Eric Baradat
Michael Isikoff, whose report on alleged Trump-Russia links was cited extensively by the FBI to secure a warrant to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page, has conceded that many of the dossier’s most scandalous allegations have yet to be supported by real evidence.
“When you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them, and, in fact, there's good grounds to think that some of the more sensational allegations will never be proven and are likely false,” Isikoff, who writes for Yahoo News, said in an interview.
Most notably, the dossier alleges that Donald Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, traveled to Prague to help coordinate “collusion” with the Russians. As Isikoff pointed out, Cohen vehemently denied the allegation in congressional testimony – and his recent plea deal for unrelated, non-collusion crimes signals that investigators think the ex-attorney is telling the truth.
“Why wasn’t [Cohen] charged with lying about it? That would have been as serious a lie as the lie he told about the Trump Tower Moscow project,” Isikoff argued. “All the signs to me are that Mueller is reaching his end game, and we may see less than many people want him to find.”
Isikoff also expressed doubts about the existence of the so-called “pee tape” which Russia is purportedly using to blackmail Trump – perhaps the most well-known and salacious claim made in the dossier.
Related: [Video] Deep-State Swamp Dweller Robert Mueller Exposed
Related: [Video] Deep-State Swamp Dweller Robert Mueller Exposed
However, Isikoff said he thought that the dossier was correct in asserting that the Russian government attempted to interfere in the election and “help Trump’s campaign.”
“In broad strokes, Christopher Steele was clearly onto something, that there was a major Kremlin effort to interfere in our elections, that they were trying to help Trump’s campaign, and that there was multiple contacts between various Russian figures close to the government and various people in Trump’s campaign,” he said.
Related: Comey admits FBI failed to verify Steele Dossier it used to obtain a spy warrant on Trump's aide
Isikoff’s skepticism is particularly noteworthy because he parroted many of Steele’s claims in a Sept. 23, 2016 article which the FBI cited in four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to spy on Trump aide Carter Page. The FBI repeatedly claimed that it “did not believe” that Steele was the direct source for Isikoff’s article – but it was later revealed that the ex-spy had in fact briefed the reporter at the direction of Fusion GPS.
FBI, DOJ Plan Redactions Despite Trump’s Document Order
Russia TruthSeptember 19, 2018Adam Schiff, Andrew McCabe, Blookberg, Carter Page, Christopher Steele, Clinton, DOJ, FBI, FISA, Gang of Eight, House Intelligence Committee, James Comey, Robert Mueller, Steele Dossier, Trump
No comments
FBI, DOJ Plan Redactions Despite Trump’s Document Order
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump has demanded the “immediate declassification” of sensitive materials about the Russia investigation, but the agencies responsible are expected to propose redactions that would keep some information secret, according to three people familiar with the matter.
The
Justice Department, FBI and Office of the Director of National
Intelligence are going through a methodical review and can’t offer a
timeline for finishing, said the people, who weren’t authorized to speak
publicly about the sensitive matter.
The
White House issued a statement on Monday listing material that Trump
wants declassified immediately, echoing demands of Republican lawmakers
who share his contention that the continuing investigation into Russian
interference in the 2016 election was tainted by anti-Trump bias well
before Robert Mueller was named special counsel to run it.
Among
Trump’s demands was the full public release of all text messages
concerning the Russia probe by Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and
by several former officials, including two who were fired -- former FBI
Director James Comey and his deputy, Andrew McCabe. One person
described the order to release text messages as unprecedented, and
another said additional talks will probably be held with the White House
over the matter.
The
Justice Department and FBI are expected to submit their documents and
proposed redactions to the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence, which will assemble all the material into a package and
hand it over to the White House, according to the people.
While
the agencies want to guard against revealing classified sources and
methods about the ongoing Russia investigation, doing so could put them
in direct conflict with Trump, who as president has the power to
override the agencies and declassify material on his own.
It’s
too early to say if any officials would resign in protest should Trump
do that, one person said. Trump could ask the agencies to go back and
scrub the redacted material further.
Critics,
including leading congressional Democrats, contend that Trump has
crossed a line by ordering release of the documents in order to
interfere with and undermine the Russia investigation in which he’s a
key figure.
“President
Trump, in a clear abuse of power, has decided to intervene in a pending
law enforcement investigation by ordering the selective release of
materials he believes are helpful to his defense team and thinks will
advance a false narrative,” Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat
on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Monday.
Triggering Review
Trump took the rare step of ordering material released after a group of conservative House Republicans asked him to do so.
“When
the president issues such an order, it triggers a declassification
review process that is conducted by various agencies within the
intelligence community, in conjunction with the White House counsel, to
seek to ensure the safety of America’s national security interests,” a
Justice Department spokesman said in a statement. “The department and
the Federal Bureau of Investigation are already working with the
Director of National Intelligence to comply with the president’s order.”
Some
of what Trump requested was well known to the Justice Department and
FBI and was already under review for potential declassification.
They
have already been reviewing whether and how to release more of a
previously secret warrant application to eavesdrop on Carter Page, a
foreign policy adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign who was flagged
by intelligence agencies as a target of Russian interest. Page hasn’t
been accused of wrongdoing and has said that while he had conversations
with Russian officials, he wasn’t an agent of the Russian government.
The
agencies also have been reviewing whether and how to release reports of
interviews with Ohr on his role in the Russia inquiry.
But
another part of the White House statement caused confusion because it
asked for “all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all
Carter Page FISA applications.
Confidential Informant
The
Justice Department is interpreting that request to mean information
about the use of a confidential informant during the early parts of the
investigation, one person said. The department had previously briefed
the “Gang of Eight,” Republican and Democratic congressional leaders and
heads of the Intelligence committees, on the informant.
Trump
and his supporters have repeatedly attacked the FBI and Justice
Department for relying partly on a dossier on Trump compiled by former
British spy Christopher Steele in order to get the warrant on Page. They
contend that Justice and FBI officials didn’t fully disclose that
Steele was paid in part by Trump’s rival in the presidential
campaign, Hillary Clinton.
Democrats have said information other than the Steele dossier was used to obtain the warrant on Page.
The
initial warrant request called Page “an agent of a foreign power” and
said “the FBI believes Page has been the subject of targeted recruitment
by the Russian government,” according to the document.
Latest news:
- ‘I don’t have an attorney-general’: Trump slams Sessions in Oval Office interview
- [Video] Noam Chomsky on the historical origins of Christian Zionism, and why the US so fervently supports Israel
- Ukrainian region bans 'Russian-language cultural products' in public spaces
- Israel’s Failed Attempt to Start WWIII Is the Beginning of the End in Syria