Rich Democratic
donors, including George Soros, have thrown their weight behind super
PACs' effort to lambast Donald Trump's handling of the COVID-19
outbreak. Vladimir Golstein, associate professor at Rhode Island's Brown
University, foresees that the Dems will try to "milk" the crisis until
November in order to undermine Trump's re-election bid.
More articles by Prof. Vladimir Golstein
On Monday, CNN
reported
that Priorities USA Action, the largest Democratic Party super PAC, is
launching a $6 million ad campaign slamming President Donald Trump for
his response to the coronavirus pandemic. Meanwhile, another Dem super
PAC, PACRONYM, announced a similar campaign on 17 March, vowing to spend
$5 million on it,
according to
The Washington Post.
For its part,
The Washington Free Beacon notes
that it is just a small portion of funds allocated by wealthy liberal
donors, including George Soros, to "weaken" Trump. The media outlet
highlights that this year Soros has already
funneled
$5 million to Priorities USA Action through his Democracy PAC which was
created in July 2019 to serve as a hub for his 2020 race spending. For
comparison's sake PACRONYM reportedly
received just $250,000 from the Hungarian-born billionaire last year.
In February, the Democrats decided to shift from their impeachment failure to a new campaign
targeting Trump's potential economic setbacks,
according
to Politico. At the time, the media outlet explained that while the
Democratic camp had begun "to aggressively go after Trump’s track record
on the economy" it couldn't decide "exactly how to message it". The
coronavirus-driven recession has come in handy for them, according to
Vladimir Golstein, associate professor at Brown University in Rhode
Island.
Sputnik: What's your take on the Dems' recent anti-Trump
effort? Is it politically correct to capitalise on the American people's
fears amid the pandemic? Does the end justify the means in this case?
Vladimir Golstein: Democrats are doing the best they
can to utilise this crisis in order to “soften” their target: President
Trump. While the future of Trump is not certain, the current crisis has
already had its first serious political victim: Senator Sanders, whose
fall in the primaries was as spectacular as his rise just before the
crisis began to unfold. Due to the restrictions on public gatherings,
due to the general panic, and consistent drumbeat from Democratic
leadership that, first, former Vice President Biden is a figure of
stability and unity, and that, second, Senator Sanders is both too
radical and too weak to beat Trump, Sanders began to lose dramatically.
Encouraged by their success with Sanders, the Democratic leadership
clearly used fear-mongering to present the current medical crisis as the
result of Trump’s profound inadequacies. Had all these events unfolded
in the fall, Trump would have sunk as quickly as did Sanders,
paving the way for Biden straight into White House.
The timing, however, proved somewhat
premature. Consequently, Democrats intend to milk the crisis all the way
to November. Thus, their persistent demands that the whole country
comes to a standstill. All this presented as the desire to safe lives by
quarantining the whole population, but the motives behind the
scare-tactics are obvious.
Conversely, Trump originally erred on the other side, trying to
diminish the dangers of the infection. Needless to say, Democrats
immediately denounced Trump’s political motives, while keeping silent
about their own. Now the issue has been expanded from the medical
dimension into economics. The situation appears rather dire, millions
apply for unemployment, the market sinks, and general gloom prevails.
Trump’s attempts to get the economy back on track are greeted with
condemnations and accusations of cruelty. Yet, it is clear, what is
driving the Democrat Party's righteous anger.
An interesting situation emerges: while the educated and liberal
class that does its job via computers, want the current quarantine to
continue, since its loss of income is insignificant, Trump’s traditional
supporters: both rich owners of various enterprises, and their
blue-collar workers, want to get back to work. So as usual, economics
will decide everything.
Sputnik: Is it ethical, in your view, to spend millions on
anti-Trump political ads amid the coronavirus outbreak, instead of, for
example, supporting those in need?
Vladimir Golstein: As they say, “all fair in love
and war", and there is no doubt that Democrats view Trump as their
enemy. It is naïve to expect political parties to abstain from
politicking. Where Democrats seem to have miscalculated, however, is in
the power and decisiveness of Trump. As the president of the most
powerful and wealthy country in the world, he has endless means at his
disposal. I am sure that he’ll do everything he can to get the economy
back on track, and to solve the medical crisis before the summer ends.
In my estimation, Democrats will come to regret their decision to sink
Sanders –
the only candidate who could have unseated Trump in November.
Sputnik: What do you think about the US liberal MSM coverage of Donald Trump's handling of the crisis?
Vladimir Golstein: I try to avoid mass media in the
United States, since it is so politicised that it is not worth the
effort to read through endless barbs and accusations. However, just a
brief look at the articles carried by liberal publications, such as the
Huffington Post, for example, conveys just one message: Trump is not
qualified, Trump is not ready, Trump is dangerous, Trump is wrong.
Needless to say, all these innuendos are given under the pretext of covering the COVID-19 news, and therefore accompanied by the pictures of hospital doctors, suffering patients, and so on. This is a typical title: "I'm An ER Doctor In NYC. Trump's Coronavirus Plan Isn't Just Dangerous, It's Deadly".
There is no doubt that Trump’s handling of the crisis, and on a more
serious level, his handling of the public investment in hospitals and
medicine, has been inadequate. But the same can be said about his
critics, the Democratic leadership, that did the best they could to
neutralise Bernie Sanders, even though he was one of the few candidates
who consistently arguing for the overhaul of the medical system. So the
criticism of Democrats, who constantly vote to give billions to military
and nothing for medicine, seems to be highly disingenuous and
opportunistic.
The virus is a serious issue in
itself, and even more serious in what it tells us about the bankruptcy
of neoliberalism, and the collapse of the post-Cold War world order. We
need some professionals writing about the former, and some thoughtful
economists to write about the latter when dust settles. What we don't
need is the highly partisan mass media, which uses any opportunity to
report on the coronavirus to blame Trump for his failures, greed, and
corruption.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.